Post by account_disabled on Dec 31, 2023 5:58:16 GMT
Acircumstances subsequent to the conclusion of the contract be taken into account if the analysis of the national law rule leads to this Should Article paragraph of the LEC be interpreted in the sense that it cannot constitute an obstacle to consumer protection In accordance with Directive and in particular with Article and Article thereof in order to guarantee the protection of consumers and users according to the principles of equivalence and effectiveness a national court when finds the existence of an abusive clause regarding anticipated.
Demandability must it consider it as not being included in the Country Email List contract and apply the appropriate consequences including if the professional has respected the minimum period provided by the national law The Court of Justice of the European Union decided to respond as follows Articles and of Council Directive EEC of April on unfair terms in consumer contracts must be interpreted in the sense that they oppose a provision of national law such as the fourth transitional provision of Ley de medidas para reinforcer la proteccin a los deudores hipotecarios reestructuracin de deuda y alquiler social Law on measures to improve the protection of mortgage borrowers debt restructuring and social housing rental of.
May which subjects the exercise by consumers in respect of whom a mortgage enforcement procedure was initiated but was not completed before the date of entry into force of this law of their right to contest this procedure citing the allegedly abusive nature of some contractual clauses of a term of expiry of a month calculated from the day following the publication of the respective law. that it does not oppose a national rule such as that resulting from the content of article of Ley de.
Demandability must it consider it as not being included in the Country Email List contract and apply the appropriate consequences including if the professional has respected the minimum period provided by the national law The Court of Justice of the European Union decided to respond as follows Articles and of Council Directive EEC of April on unfair terms in consumer contracts must be interpreted in the sense that they oppose a provision of national law such as the fourth transitional provision of Ley de medidas para reinforcer la proteccin a los deudores hipotecarios reestructuracin de deuda y alquiler social Law on measures to improve the protection of mortgage borrowers debt restructuring and social housing rental of.
May which subjects the exercise by consumers in respect of whom a mortgage enforcement procedure was initiated but was not completed before the date of entry into force of this law of their right to contest this procedure citing the allegedly abusive nature of some contractual clauses of a term of expiry of a month calculated from the day following the publication of the respective law. that it does not oppose a national rule such as that resulting from the content of article of Ley de.
